Eelmine jagatud artikkel tuletas meelde ühe värske loo juhtimisajakirjast ja kuna siin on ilmsed sidemed, siis tasuks ka seda lugeda. Seda enam, et tegu on vabalevis oleva looga ja teadmiste saamiseks ei ole vaja kusagile sisse murda.

Autorid võtavad eesmärgiks:

This article draws upon the emergent PC literature and research that views PC and its violations as dynamic and social (Alcover et al., 2017; Bankins, 2015; Parzefall & Coyle-Shapiro, 2011; Wiechers, Coyle-Shapiro, Lub, & ten Have, 2019). We adopt and integrate a social information processing (SIP) framework (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978), a sensemaking approach (e.g., Weick, 1995), and insights from social networks (Ho, 2005) to explore the role of social information and interpersonal cues regarding coworker’s PC violations as factors shaping a focal individual’s psychological contract schema.

… ja veel täpsemalt:

we carve out a distinct contribution in which the focus is on the intrapsychic and cognitive processes related to focal individuals’ PC when a negative disruption happens to a coworker. The main contribution of our study is to explain how social cues given by a coworker may lead to changes in focal individuals’ PC schema, even in absence of focal individuals’ breach and violation.

Peamine järeldus:

Our main contribution uncovers the intrapsychic and cognitive processes related to individuals’ PC when coworkers experience a PC violation. […] Overall, this study proposes that third parties’ (i.e., coworkers) experiences influence how focal individuals make sense of their employment relationship.

Costa, S., & Coyle-Shapiro, J. (2021). What Happens to Others Matters! An Intraindividual Processual Approach to Coworkers’ Psychological Contract Violations. Group & Organization Management, 46(2), 153–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121994016